Hi Ketan,

please see inline:


On 04/07/2025 09:19, Ketan Talaulikar via Datatracker wrote:
Ketan Talaulikar has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity-07: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks to the authors and the WG for this straightforward extension for IGP
Flex-Algorithm feature.

I have a few comments to offer :

1) Even if it is obvious to OSPF implementors, please mention in the
introduction section that the term OSPF is used to cover both OSPFv2 and OSPFv3
protocols.
sure
2) Please correct the IANA considerations for OSPF code points to indicate that
the allocations done via early allocation process need to be made permanent.
sure
3) Regarding the IGP Flex-Algorithm Path Computation Rules registry, I believe
IANA would require a number limit say 1 - 255 to start with? While I agree with
Med that "Standards Action" would be a more suitable registration policy, I
also understand the authors reasoning for "Expert Review". There is likely a
technical oversight/guidance needed in ensuring that the ordering is proper
while performing assignments (something that calls for a DE). So, perhaps
"Standards Action with Expert Review" is an option to consider?

we have been living with "Expert Review" for all ISIS registries for 20+ years, I would think it is good enough.

thanks,
Peter





_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- lsr@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to lsr-le...@ietf.org

Reply via email to