Hi Roman,
thanks for your comments, please see inline (##PP):
On 08/07/2025 19:51, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker wrote:
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity-07: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-igp-flex-algo-reverse-affinity/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
** Section 11.3
This section creates a new registry with an “expert review” review registration
policy but does not provide any guidance on the criteria the expert(s) should
use.
##PP
we will provide the guidance in the next revision.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
** Section 11.3
The "IGP Flex-Algo Path Computation Rules Registry" specifies the
ordered set of rules that MUST be used to prune links from the
topology during the Flex-Algorithm path computation.
Consider if the RFC2119 language needs to be here. This section shouldn’t
specify protocol behavior.
##PP
fixed.
thanks,
Peter
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
