Hi Acee, The Green WG does not have path computation as one of their use cases. They are focused on YANG modeling for a variety of other purposes.
Tony > On Aug 1, 2025, at 3:11 PM, Acee Lindem - acee.ietf at gmail.com > <[email protected]> wrote: > > All, > > It would be better if we got our use cases from the Green WG and the > attendant metrics were derived from these use cases. > > I don't think we want a variety of point solutions - at least, we don't want > to start from there. > > Thanks, > Acee > >> On Aug 1, 2025, at 3:53 PM, Tony Li <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Hi Raul, >> >>> Yes, sorry, I had in mind the reverse approximation to the problem. >>> Indicating current power, power-save capability and current power-save >>> status (including interfaces) the resulting power-group hierarchy has >>> enough information and you don’t need calculations for the sleeping bw but >>> maybe I’m missing something obvious. >> >> >> Please note that we are NOT trying to do full modeling in the IGP. That’s >> over in the GREEN WG. Our goal is simpler: path computation. >> >> T >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] >> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] > _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
