Hi Joel,

Not sure if this would be what you are looking for (especially because is an 
outcome of BMWG and not LSR), but draft-ietf-bmwg-sr-bench-meth includes 
proposal of segment list scale testing that could serve for the purpose you 
comment (that is, adding maximum number of 128 bit pieces as an aspect to be 
considered during the benchmarking process). So maybe the point that you raise 
can be included here.

I copy my co-authors in case they want to complement with additional comments.

Best regards

Luis

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Joel Halpern <[email protected]>
Enviado el: jueves, 27 de noviembre de 2025 11:07
Para: lsr <[email protected]>
Asunto: [Lsr] Where to clarify RFC 9352 relative to SID containers

AVISO/WARNING: Este correo electrónico se originó desde fuera de la 
organización. No haga clic en enlaces ni abra archivos adjuntos a menos que 
reconozca al remitente y sepa que el contenido es seguro / This email has been 
originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open 
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.


First, to be clear, what I am describing is NOT an error in RFC 9352.
Thus, I don't think an erratum is the appropriate way to document for future 
readers this additional aspect of the intent of certain maximum segment depth 
advertisements for SRv6.

RFC 9352 talks about the maximum number of SIDs.  However, when SIDs are 
carried in compressed SID containers, the number that matters for some (maybe 
all?) of the maximum segment depths is the number of 128 bit
pieces, not the number of SIDs.   Apparently, several implementations
are consistent with that.  It seems a bit odd to write another RFC just to say 
that.  Is there some document in process that could sensibly capture this.

(As RFC 9352 predates the Compressed SID RFC it makes sense that this case is 
not disucssed there.)

Yours,

Joel

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

________________________________

Este mensaje y sus adjuntos se dirigen exclusivamente a su destinatario, puede 
contener información privilegiada o confidencial y es para uso exclusivo de la 
persona o entidad de destino. Si no es usted. el destinatario indicado, queda 
notificado de que la lectura, utilización, divulgación y/o copia sin 
autorización puede estar prohibida en virtud de la legislación vigente. Si ha 
recibido este mensaje por error, le rogamos que nos lo comunique inmediatamente 
por esta misma vía y proceda a su destrucción.

The information contained in this transmission is confidential and privileged 
information intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. 
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication 
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, do not 
read it. Please immediately reply to the sender that you have received this 
communication in error and then delete it.

Esta mensagem e seus anexos se dirigem exclusivamente ao seu destinatário, pode 
conter informação privilegiada ou confidencial e é para uso exclusivo da pessoa 
ou entidade de destino. Se não é vossa senhoria o destinatário indicado, fica 
notificado de que a leitura, utilização, divulgação e/ou cópia sem autorização 
pode estar proibida em virtude da legislação vigente. Se recebeu esta mensagem 
por erro, rogamos-lhe que nos o comunique imediatamente por esta mesma via e 
proceda a sua destruição
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to