Hi, kindly modify the note in my errata report to the following: ``` The correct YANG module name is "ietf-ospf-admin-tags" as defined in section 7.1. ```
Best, Mrigank Pawagi ________________________________ From: RFC Errata System <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2026 6:13 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]> Cc: Mrigank Pawagi <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC9825 (8842) External Email The following errata report has been submitted for RFC9825, "Extensions to OSPF for Advertising Prefix Administrative Tags". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid8842 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Mrigank Pawagi <[email protected]> Section: 8 Original Text ------------- ietf-ospf-admin-tag Corrected Text -------------- ietf-ospf-admin-tags Notes ----- The correct YANG module name is "ietf-ospf-admin-tag" as defined in section 7.1. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC9825 (draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-admin-tags-29) -------------------------------------- Title : Extensions to OSPF for Advertising Prefix Administrative Tags Publication Date : July 2025 Author(s) : A. Lindem, Ed., P. Psenak, Y. Qu Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Link State Routing Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
