Hi LSR Chairs, This seems like an appropriate and useful path forward.
One additional suggestion: it would be valuable for draft-many-lsr-power-group to include some consideration of how its mechanisms can be evaluated from an energy perspective. For example, guidance on measuring impact, comparing against a baseline, or reporting observed energy savings (and any managed decreases and/or unintended increases) in deployments. Even lightweight guidance here could help ensure that experimental results are actionable and can inform the broader work in green or elsewhere. Best, Carlos. > On Apr 28, 2026, at 11:04 PM, Christian Hopps <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi lsr-wg, green-wg, et al., > The authors of draft-many-lsr-power-group-02 > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-many-lsr-power-group/) have requested > early code-point allocation. As this is normally done after WG adoption we > would like to move forward on that front first. > The GREEN wg chairs have expressed interest in this draft as far as not > wanting to be developing at cross-purposes with the work from GREEN. > A proposed way forward that came from discussions between the LSR and GREEN > chairs and ADs would be for LSR to adopt this document as experimental and > move it forward with the addition of some text. The text would state that > work is on going in the IETF to define a broad power framework and that > future solutions may be proposed to incorporate this work. > Additionally, GREEN is asking the authors to review the green framework draft > (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bcmj-green-power-and-energy-yang/) > and attempt to align where possible, and avoid incompatabilty if possible > (e.g., consider terminology and hierarchy where different). > If the work is adopted then LSR would request constructive review and > feedback from GREEN for any changes that can be made to improve the LSR work > with the goal of moving the work forward. > The LSR chairs and ADs believe the intention of the authors is to get > solution quickly deployed to start making immediate progress on power saving. > The interest from GREEN WG is that if we do this we indicate it’s an > experimental approach and we make an effort to allow for later solutions that > would incorporate the more comprehensive framework that they are working on. > Additionally, it has been pointed out that GREEN WG should be able to benefit > from the real-world experience gained from deployments of the experiment LSR > RFC. > This email services as an opportunity to raise concerns with this plan to > move forward. > Thanks, Lsr Chairs. > _______________________________________________ > Green mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
