Speaking as both WG chair and WG member: I don't have a problem with this draft as long as RFC 5392 (OSPF) and RFC 9346 (IS-IS) are used as the source of the BGP-LS inter-AS topo information. We don't have time in LSR to rehash the IGP stub-links drafts just because IDR is advancing this document.
Thanks, Acee > On May 26, 2026, at 8:45 AM, Susan Hares <[email protected]> wrote: > > Greetings LSR: > IDR has reached consensus to publish > draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-inter-as-topology-ext-32. > This draft defines a new type within the BGP-LS Network Layer Reachability > Information (NLRI) for an Inter-AS Link, as well as three new > type-length-values (TLVs) for the BGP-LS Inter-AS Link descriptor. It > allows the following two types of use cases: 1) IGP (ospf or isis) to BGP-LS > and 2) BGP-only (import data from static/direct interfaces) to BGP-LS). > Please respond to this message if you object to the publication of the > draft. Otherwise, the IDR chairs will forward this to the IESG for > publication on 6/1/2026. > Cheerily, Sue Hares > Shepherd > IDR co-chair _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
