Hi Eric, Please look at -11.
> On Jun 22, 2026, at 5:41 AM, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-lsr-isis-flex-algo-yang-08: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ > for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-isis-flex-algo-yang/ > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Thanks for the work done in this document. Some comments > > ### Section 3 > > About this IS-IS YANG module re-using a type specified in > ietf-lsr-ospf-flex-algo-yang. If common to IS-IS and OSPF, then why not having > a common module ? (of course, it this is the *only* common thing, then my > comment can be ignored) We do have common IANA-maintained modules for the common IGP registries - they are just created in ietf-lsr-ospf-flex-algo-yang. > > Should the unit be specified in all the bandwidth-related leaf nodes ? Added: 'units "bytes per second";' on bandwidth-related leaf nodes. > > Unusual presentation with the YANG tree directly followed by the YANG module, > why not ? ;-) Added a description of the YANG modules. Thanks, Acee > > > _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
