hi Les:
Thank you very much for your suggestion, I think
your are right, so I have updated the draft for a new version just
now.
Best Regards
Tao He
------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)"<[email protected]>;
Date: Sat, Jul 18, 2026 11:54 PM
To:
"[email protected]"<[email protected]>;
"lsr"<[email protected]>;
Subject: Comments on draft-he-lsr-srv6-mirror-sid-igp-encoding
【本邮件为外部邮件，请注意核实发件人身份，并谨慎处理邮件内容中的链接及附件】
Draft authors -
This draft defines a new sub-TLV for the Locator TLV:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-he-lsr-srv6-mirror-sid-igp-encoding-00.html#name-is-is-srv6-mirror-sid-sub-t
But the format is identical to the existing END SID sub-TLV defined in
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9352.html#name-srv6-end-sid-sub-tlv . There
is no need to define a new sub-TLV - the existing sub-TLV can be used with the
new behavior.
I note that the new behavior (END.M) is defined in
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection-24.html#name-srv6-endpoint-behaviors
- which is fine.
You also define a new sub-sub-TLV to advertise the Locators protected by
the Mirror SID - which is fine - but the new sub-TLV is unnecessary and should
be removed.
The same comments apply to OSPFv3 as well.
Thanx.
Les
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
