I agree with Tony - this is an IQ test and we don’t want to fail.

John
Sent from my iPhone

> On Aug 5, 2026, at 12:03 PM, Tony Li <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to renew my objection: L2 bundle members should not be 
> enumerated.  This defeats the purpose of abstraction.
> 
> Tony
> 
> 
>> On Aug 5, 2026, at 8:54 AM, Acee Lindem via Datatracker - noreply at 
>> ietf.org <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> This message starts a WG Last Call for:
>> draft-ietf-lsr-l2-bundle-member-remote-id-03
>> 
>> This Working Group Last Call ends on 2026-08-19
>> 
>> Abstract:
>>  In networks where Layer 2 (L2) interface bundles (such as a Link
>>  Aggregation Group (LAG) as defined in IEEE 802.1AX) are deployed, a
>>  controller may need to collect the connectivity relationships between
>>  bundle members for traffic engineering (TE) purposes.  For example,
>>  when performing topology management and bidirectional path
>>  computation for TE, it is essential to know the connectivity
>>  relationships among bundle members.
>> 
>>  This document describes how OSPF and IS-IS would advertise the remote
>>  interface identifiers for Layer 2 bundle members.  The corresponding
>>  extension of BGP-LS is also specified.
>> 
>> File can be retrieved from:
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lsr-l2-bundle-member-remote-id-03.txt
>> 
>> Please review and indicate your support or objection to proceed with the
>> publication of this document by replying to this email keeping [email protected]
>> in copy. Objections should be explained and suggestions to resolve them are
>> highly appreciated.
>> 
>> Authors, and WG participants in general, are reminded of the Intellectual
>> Property Rights (IPR) disclosure obligations described in BCP 79 [1].
>> Appropriate IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions
>> of BCP 78 [1] and BCP 79 [2] must be filed, if you are aware of any.
>> Sanctions available for application to violators of IETF IPR Policy can be
>> found at [3].
>> 
>> Thank you.
>> 
>> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp78/
>> [2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/bcp79/
>> [3] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6701/
>> 
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-l2-bundle-member-remote-id/
>> 
>> There is also an HTML version available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-lsr-l2-bundle-member-remote-id-03.html
>> 
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-lsr-l2-bundle-member-remote-id-03
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to