Hi Les, Yes - the published RFC is better.
There is also section 2.2.2 in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8537/ Thanks, Acee > On Aug 5, 2026, at 6:32 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Acee - > > Thanx for the support and the suggestion. > > Your reference seems out of date. Shouldn’t it be to: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9059.html#name-co-routed-associated-bidire > ?? > > Les > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Acee Lindem <[email protected]> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 5, 2026 2:38 PM >> To: Acee Lindem <[email protected]> >> Cc: lsr <[email protected]>; [email protected] >> Subject: Re: WG Last Call for "Advertisement of Remote Interface Identifiers >> for >> Layer 2 Bundle Members" - draft-ietf-lsr-l2-bundle-member-remote-id-03 >> >> Speaking as WG member: >> >> I support publication of this document. >> >> I'd also recommend adding a reference to >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir- >> 06#section-3.3 for the co-routed bi-directional LSP requirement. Thanks to >> Rakesh Gandhi for providing. >> >> Thanks, >> Acee >> >>> On Aug 5, 2026, at 10:58 AM, Acee Lindem <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Esteemed Members of the LSR WG, >>> >>> This begins the WG Last Call for "Advertisement of Remote Interface >> Identifiers for Layer 2 Bundle Members" - draft-ietf-lsr-l2-bundle-member- >> remote-id-03. >>> Please indicate your support or objection to this list before Thursday, >>> August >> 27th, 2026. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Acee (As LSR Co-Chair) >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] >>> To unsubscribe, send an email to [email protected] > _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
