Hi Robert,
> Your reply makes it very clear what should be the case and confirms what I > was hoping for. I only asked based on this sentence of yours: > > "If an interface is not power sleep capable, then its PSP is not relevant in > metric computation." > > I did not know what "metric computation" you were referring to. > > Was this normal SPF - hope not ? Was this CSPF on headends - hope not ? Was > it something else ? > > I asked to make sure metrics of all links are relevant in both SPF and CSPF > computations. I think that we’ve been very clear and said “Traffic Engineering” throughout. For now, this is CSPF only, at the headend. Could someone do something with PSP during normal SPF? Yes, but that’s future work. The obvious issues are ones of incremental deployment. Cheers, Tony _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
