Hi Acee and WG, I believe it is reasonable to separate the IGP encoding from the original SRv6 egress protection document.
I support the adoption of draft-he-lsr-srv6-mirror-sid-igp-encoding-01 as an LSR WG document. Best regards, Tianyi Huang Computer Network Information Center Chinese Academy of Sciences > 2026年8月31日 23:37，Acee Lindem <[email protected]> 写道： > > LSR WG, > > For some time now, the RTGWG has been working on the working group document > SRv6 Path Egress Protection - "draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection-25". > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-rtgwg-srv6-egress-protection/ > > Recently, the IGP encodings for this SRv6 egress protection have been split > out into a separate LSR draft, "IGP Encoding for SRv6 Mirror SID in Egress > Protection" - draft-he-lsr-srv6-mirror-sid-igp-encoding-01. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-he-lsr-srv6-mirror-sid-igp-encoding/ > > We now intend to adopt this IGP encoding document "IGP Encoding for SRv6 > Mirror SID in Egress Protection" - > draft-he-lsr-srv6-mirror-sid-igp-encoding-01, as an LSR WG document so the > RTGWG document can be progressed. > > Please indicate your support or objection to adoption to this list by > Tuesday, September 15th, 2026. > > Thanks, > Acee > _______________________________________________ > rtgwg mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
