>>>>> "Luke" == Luke Kanies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Luke> Narayan Desai wrote: >>>>>>> "Wes" == Wesley Craig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Wes> What we really need is a paper comparing these two systems. Wes> Perhaps you two could collaborate on writing one. >> >> I have a sneaking suspicion that isn't in the cards, since we >> don't really agree on the comparison. Luke still seems to think >> that the tools are quite similar, while I think that they have >> really grown in two substantially different directions. Luke> Again, I think it'd be useful to talk about how we might model Luke> a given system with different tools, and maybe what the user Luke> experience would look like. Making claims with no examples to Luke> back them up is just a rat-hole. I agree, but an important part of talking is listening. I have been goaded into responding twice after saying I was done with this thread. I am glad that others are understanding my point; Stephen seemed to have a decent handle on what I was talking about from the earlier discussion. I am glad that someone got something out of the discussion. -nld :who is again done; the third time is the charm. _______________________________________________ lssconf-discuss mailing list lssconf-discuss@inf.ed.ac.uk http://lists.inf.ed.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/lssconf-discuss
