Hi Ray,

Just to document my comments from the telecon:

This is a good target for the scope of the "skunk works" Middleware/APP
meeting.  Much of this is modeled at the high level in the UML already, but
as you say it needs to be taken down to the next level of detail.

Regarding PCS, I assume for DC1 that we will be using "static" pipelines, so
instantiation will be minimal, mostly just "targeting".  That said, it is
appropriate to cover more than that in the Middleware/App meeting.  Thanks!

Jeff

> From: Ray Plante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Ray Plante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, LSST Data Management
> <[email protected]>
> Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 10:57:40 -0600 (CST)
> To: LSST Data Management <[email protected]>
> Subject: [LSST-data]  problem statement for focusing further modeling
> [MiddleWG]
> 
> Keywords: MiddleWG
> 
> Hi MWGers,
> 
> Sorry for the delay on this.  Below is my strawman problem statement for
> focusing our further modeling activities.  Please share your comments on
> the list so we can refine it.  I recommend we have a call on Wed. to
> finalize this and try to list the specific UML use cases we need to
> focus on.  
> 
> thanks,
> Ray
> 
> This statement describes a very broad use case that can elucidate
> important functionality and interfaces of the Data Management System.
> We will use it to identify the more specific use cases to develop to a
> deeper level.  We also expect this to guide the design and
> implementation of our data challenges.
> 
> This use case covers the transformation raw images into calibrated
> images and object detections on a nightly basis.  It follows the
> dataflow from the point they are recorded onto disk on the Mountaintop
> down to the base camp where the Calibration and Object Detection
> pipelines are executed.  We continue to follow the flow of raw data to
> the Archive Center where the same pipelines are run again, and the
> results are ingested into the archive.
> 
> As we drill down and model in more detail, we will pay particular
> attention to the following activities:
> 
>  o  operations of the Pipeline Management System
>     *  interfaces and events that trigger activity
> 
>  o  operations of the Data Access Framework:
>     *  inter-site data replication
>     *  data staging for data-parallel processing supporting
>         -  CCD-indepedent processing
>         -  cross-talk correction
>     *  image ingest
>     *  catalog ingest
>     *  replication of data to base camp as inputs to future
>        processing
> 
>  o  operations of the Pipeline Construction System
>     *  instantiating/configuring the Calibration Pipeline
>     *  instantiating/configuring the Detection Pipeline
>     *  use of Policies in configuration
>     *  deployment of pipelines on processing nodes
>     *  determination of necessary input data
> 
> We recognize that the fully modeled Data Management System will
> actually cover a lot more activities.  For now, we will account for these
> at a high level in the model; however, in this exercise we will not
> develop these in as deep a level of detail.  The functionality we will
> *not* focus on in detail include:
> 
>  o  execution of the association pipeline
>  o  generation and distribution of alerts
>  o  non-daily pipelines, moving object pipelines
>  o  data publishing, public access to data
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LSST-data mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.lsstmail.org/mailman/listinfo/lsst-data
> 

_______________________________________________
LSST-data mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lsstmail.org/mailman/listinfo/lsst-data

Reply via email to