Good points Andy. In fact, our Data Products Working Group does have a list of "actors" for use cases, and the internal actors are included (such as the one that you mention), though perhaps we have not been very explicit with those use cases yet.
p.s. Go Patriots! And go Tigers! (I am LSU alum, and GMU employed)... what a great March Madness weekend!!!! - krik > Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 13:36:24 -0800 > From: Andrew Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [LSST-data] WRT Kirk's Astrometry Use Cases > To: [email protected] > > Hi all - > > Dave's email gave me the realization that we will explicitly need > to establish debugging use cases for all of our components, unless > software development is going to happen "off the radar". These will > likely be completely different than the community use cases. As a > component developer, I would just would like to emphasize this, as I > haven't seen much discussion along these lines. > > /\ > _______________________________________________ > LSST-data mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.lsstmail.org/mailman/listinfo/lsst-data ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. Kirk D. Borne NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, SSDOO Program Manager, QSS Group Inc. and George Mason University, Associate Research Professor, College of Science <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tel. +1-301-286-0696 Fax: 301-286-1771 Staff page: http://rings.gsfc.nasa.gov/~borne/ US Virtual Observatory: http://www.us-vo.org/ Large Synoptic Survey Telescope: http://www.lssto.org/ _______________________________________________ LSST-data mailing list [email protected] http://www.lsstmail.org/mailman/listinfo/lsst-data
