Keywords: DataAccWG

Attendees
   Russell Owen
   Ray Plante
   Ani Thakar
   Maria Nieto-Santisteban
   Sergei Nikolaev
   Kem Cook
   Arun Jagatheesan
   Jacek Becla



database and image archive storage estimates
============================================

We need to decide "how deep into the noise we want to dig"
 - depending on that, the numbers provided by Tim might change



"latest-greatest" release
 - better name? --> "unreleased"
 - yes, we definitely need disk space for unreleased data
   and provide quick access
 - the spreadsheet currently assumes size of latest-greatest
   data = size of last release, will fix it


how to do science if only 2 releases on disk?
 - working on theses ~3 years --> 6 releases
 - if big demand from community for older releases,
   community might be able to help and provide disk space
 - storage should be cheap enough to allow for making
   local copies of an older release or a part of release


might be cheaper to rebuild index than to bring it from tape
  - perhaps if we hand data to "someone else", it is easier
    if no extra steps like rebuilding indexes are required
  - we will have mechanisms in place to automatically "patch"
    data while bringing it from tape, so not a real issue


estimated deep storage size needed for all releases of
catalog ~30PB
 - estimate for images:~60 PB
 - db: 1/3 of total deep storage
   - mostly due to the fact that each release bigger
 - that is roughly consistent with sdss, where image data
   x3-4 bigger than database size



calibrated images will be cached for certain amount of time on disk


disk space calculation for image data in separate document now
in docushare
 --> need to decide how to merge the db-spreadsheet (which
also contains deep storage info for images now) with
the Ray's document
 - might turn info from Ray's document into spreadsheet
 - would be nice to have all numbers for disk and deep storage
   sizing in one place
 - Ray/Jacek discuss offline


calibration images can easily be many times the size of raw images
 - are we planning to store them?
 - do we want to store complete bias images?
   what about darks, flats?
  --> need to understand that


image sizes: flat 18TB/night?
  - yes, that is a fair assumption


1 PB in 2012 for archive?
 - no, assume 0 in 2012, 2012 is for putting the system together
   allotment of storage starts in 2013 based on current baseline



Estimating amount of data per release:
 - Tim's numbers only deal with part of the data
 - what part?
    - time db --> detection table
    - deep db --> object table
 - data related to simulation
    -  usually bigger than real data size in HEP
    - not very significant fraction in astronomy
- detections and object tables are the largest fraction of database size, remaining things include near neighbor data, provenance
 - near neighbor data: depends on search radius, everybody uses
   different, if we apply 90/10 rule and pick radius used by 90%
   of users, and store results, then it is ~10% of data size
 - currently in baseline requirement: object detection will
   be 0.4-4.5 TB/night depending where you point in the sky



Jacek



Jacek Becla wrote:
Keywords: DataAccWG

Hi,

We will have a Database telecon tomorrow at 11:00 PST.

Phone number: 866 330 1200
passcode: 300 2363


Agenda:
 - database and image archive storage estimates
 - DC1 db-related code implementation: progress/update


Relevant url:

https://www.lsstcorp.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-1779/lsst_storage_estimates.xls

(note that we are currently actively working on this spreadsheet,
so it may change between now and tomorrow)

Jacek
_______________________________________________
LSST-data mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lsstmail.org/mailman/listinfo/lsst-data

_______________________________________________
LSST-data mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lsstmail.org/mailman/listinfo/lsst-data

Reply via email to