Hi Jacek,
I guess we'll discuss this tomorrow, but the spreadsheet no longer has
the parameters that give the assumptions about object densities, so it's
hard to understand. I haven't yet seen the promised explanation for
why we were off by 10x on the size of the time-dependent DB, and I would
certainly like to understand the reasoning.
Tim
Jacek Becla wrote:
Keywords: DataAccWG
Hi,
We will have a DataAccWG telecon tomorrow at 11:00 PST.
Phone number: 866 330 1200
passcode: 300 2363
The agenda:
- database size estimates
- hypothetical end user access workload
Here is the latest version of the db size estimates
Kem and I put together:
http://ctiowo.ctio.noao.edu:8204/wgroups/dataaccesswg/technicalDiscussions/lsst_storage_estimates_v07.xls
I'll put it in docushare once I add database overheads
Jacek
_______________________________________________
LSST-data mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lsstmail.org/mailman/listinfo/lsst-data
begin:vcard
fn:Tim Axelrod
n:Axelrod;Tim
org:;Large Synoptic Survey Telescope
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
title:Data Management Project Scientist
tel;work:520-322-8735
version:2.1
end:vcard
_______________________________________________
LSST-data mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.lsstmail.org/mailman/listinfo/lsst-data
