In agreement with Brian.

Perhaps worth putting to the 'wealthy entrepreneurs' that they may consider
donating instead to Mastodon's development/bug-bounties, an existing migration
target that is free, open source, and already supporting very large populations
across its many instances. If they would chose otherwise, I would question their
motives from the outset.

Further, the build-it-and-they-will-come fiction has played out very badly in
the past as regards community infrastructure. I think it wiser to better what we
already have, nourishing the work, thought and communities in place. 

Again, my only missive is that Mastodon DMs are not E2EE. Such a feature would
be a boon for Mastodon, not only as message transparency to sysadmins has been
oft cited in the past few days as a reason to not migrate to Mastodon (despite
the irony of Twitter being no different).

Cheers,

Julian

..on Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 09:56:55AM +0200, Bill Woodcock wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Apr 28, 2022, at 1:49 AM, Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> wrote:
> > If there is any lesson from all this, I suspect it's that any centralized 
> > communication service even run by the most competent, well intentioned, 
> > humble and not-profit-oriented (clearly, judging from their stock price) 
> > founders & techs is susceptable to subsequent capture by others. As the 
> > open source software community figured out, the "right to fork" is the only 
> > meaningful check on the winner-take-all power-corrupts dynamic in networks.
> > 
> > So I think the answer is, those founders should either make their service 
> > with, or just go use one of the existing implementations of, Mastodon or 
> > other emerging dweb alternatives.
> 
> Yep, what Brian said.
> 
> The only legitimate way to do anything, pretty much, is by inclusively 
> designing an open protocol, and then letting people who want to use it 
> implement it.  If the protocol is well designed, you’re done.  No “service” 
> needed.
> 
>                                 -Bill
> 



> -- 
> Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from any major commercial 
> search engine. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: 
> https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/lt. Unsubscribe, change to digest 
> mode, or change password by emailing [email protected].


-- 
Liberationtech is public & archives are searchable from any major commercial 
search engine. Violations of list guidelines will get you moderated: 
https://lists.ghserv.net/mailman/listinfo/lt. Unsubscribe, change to digest 
mode, or change password by emailing [email protected].

Reply via email to