Hi Stuart,
Thanks.
Its working now.

regards,
-Nagesh A

On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Fernando Vilmar Palha
<[email protected]>wrote:

>  Hi.
>
> It works for me, too.
> Thank you.
>
> Best regards.
>
>
>
> Em 1/11/2011 20:00, Stuart Hughes escreveu:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I've checked-in changes that make a number of fixes needed for Ubuntu
> 11.10.  To get these, do:
>
> cvs up -dP
>
> If you have a failed install, you'll need to do:
>
> sudo rm -rf /opt/ltib/usr/src/rpm/BUILLD/*
>
> and then re-try the build with:
>
> ./ltib
>
> It works for me.
>
> Regards, Stuart
>
> On 01/11/11 17:30, Mike Goins wrote:
>
>  On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Stuart Hughes <[email protected]> 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  Hi Andrew,
>
> Good catch, that looks like the issue.  I'll poke around in lkc and see if I
> can move -lncurses to the right place.
>
>  Can you stomp over it with something like?
> CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -Wl,--no-as-needed"
>
>
> Though this may not guarantee that --no-as-needed would be later in
> the arg list than --as-needed.
>
>
>
>  Regards, Stuart
>
> On 01/11/11 14:49, Andrew Craig wrote:
>
>  I am getting the same errors here in 11.10 as well.  After a bit of
> looking around perhaps this explains the cause?
> http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-1833136.html
>
> Quote:
> "just for future reference as this is a common problem:
>
> oneiric uses the linker flag --as-needed by default. With this flag
> correct ordering of libraries and objects on the commandline is important.
> objects needing symbols must be placed before libraries providing them.
> E.g. file.o and staticlib.a need symbols from libm:
> wrong:
> gcc -lm file.o staticlib.a
> gcc will think libm is not needed and drops it, when it later encounters
> the objects needing it you will get undefined references
> right:
> gcc file.o staticlib.a -lm
>
> Important for autotools makefiles. Place libraries into LIBS or LDADD
> variables, not in LDFLAGS"
>
> So moving where -lncurses is in the command might fix the problem?
>
> -------------
> Andrew
>
> On 31/10/2011 6:48 PM, Stuart Hughes wrote:
>
>  Hi Guys,
>
> I've checked-in a fix for the --force-debian flag.  It seems to be
> something they put in for a while and removed later (but using it as a
> test does not return an error, sigh).
>
> As far as the lkc missing symbol errors go, I can repeat this too, but
> have not yet had time to look at (and likely won't have time for several
> days).  If anyone else has time to dig into this I'd appreciate it.
>
> Regards, Stuart
>
> On 31/10/11 09:37, Stuart Hughes wrote:
>
>  Hi Guys,
>
> I've installed 11.10 and I'm looking into this on the train this evening
> while commuting.  I'll let you know what I find.
>
> Regards, Stuart
>
> On 30/10/11 20:12, Fritz Mueller wrote:
>
>  I am seeing exactly the same thing on Ubuntu 11.10, but haven't had a
> chance to investigate.  The failing gcc line includes "-lncurses", and
> a readelf on /usr/lib/libncurses.a shows defs for the unresolved
> symbols.  Haven't had time to investigate it further than that yet.
>
> There is some evidence of this having happened to folks on previous
> releases of Ubuntu, also; a google turned up, for
> examplehttp://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-software-2/failure-to-install-ltib-on-jaunty-jackalope-9-04-a-771464/
>
> I also ran into the rpmdb --force-debian problem under Ubuntu that was
> reported here previously.  It's strange that the script explicitly
> checks for this, but still falls over (I hardwired the test to fail in
> the script to work around it temporarily, then ran into the lkc/curses
> problem.)
>
> cheers,
>   --FritzM.
>
> On Oct 30, 2011, at 8:27 AM, Stuart Hughes wrote:
>
>
>  Hi Nagesh,
>
> I've not seen this before, what host platform are you on?
>
> Regards, Stuart
>
> On 30/10/11 06:09, Nagesh A wrote:
>
>  Hi all,
> I am new to ltib and trying to configure LTIB for the first time.
> I am facing below error.
>
> It seems that the errors are because of "unresolved symbols" while
> linking lkc build.
>
> Please find attached host_config.log.
>
> regards,
> -Nagesh A
>
>
>   _______________________________________________
> LTIB home page: http://ltib.org
>
> Ltib mailing [email protected]https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib
>
>  _______________________________________________
> LTIB home page: http://ltib.org
>
> Ltib mailing [email protected]https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib
>
>  _______________________________________________
> LTIB home page: http://ltib.org
>
> Ltib mailing [email protected]https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib
>
>  _______________________________________________
> LTIB home page: http://ltib.org
>
> Ltib mailing [email protected]https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib
>
>  _______________________________________________
> LTIB home page: http://ltib.org
>
> Ltib mailing [email protected]https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LTIB home page: http://ltib.org
>
> Ltib mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib
>
>


-- 
*regards,*
*-Nagesh A*

<<assinatura_Palha.png>>

_______________________________________________
LTIB home page: http://ltib.org

Ltib mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib

Reply via email to