> Hi Mike/Sean,
>
> First of all Sean, thanks for your submission and thanks Mike for
> looking at this.
>
> Unfortunately I only have time to glance at this, but here are my
> comments:
>
>    1. The python script is okay as it's private to the platform. If it
>       could be used in a wider context (for other platforms) then
>       maybe it could be moved.  For now its fine.
>    2. The .ltibrc should not remove 'LTIB-added-package-pool' (I can't
>       recall, but someone wanted that added)
>

Its not attrbuted to me, but I use LTIB-added-package-pool is a place to
store local packages/patches (kinda like the LPP, but the LPP looked to
be quite Freescale centric).  Handy since then I can export my SCM LTIB
tree and disctribute as a tarball and it will contain the custom
packages that either are too specific for the GPP, or can not be put in
the GPP due to non-GPL licensing restrictions.


>    1. The configure line in strace.spec should not be commented out.
>
> Aside from that the only other thing to stress is that anything
> checked in should be original (add your own Copyright notice if
> appropriate) and compatible with GPLv2.  If it's not original, please
> make sure you keep all the headers/citings and that the licenses is
> GPLv2 compatible.  In a similar vein, anything uploaded to the GPP
> must be freely distributable under an appropriate Open Source license,
> and you need to fill in the details of the origin/license when you upload.
>
> Cheers, Stuart
>
>
> On 24/09/12 19:52, Mike Goins wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Sean Malloy
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I'm ready to call the diff & packages that I have up at
>>> https://drive.google.com/#folders/0B5oPSqrs5WbUNndYZ0pxTm10NkE
>>>
>>> "Release Candidate 1"
>>>
>>> Assuming there are no objections, what's the first step towards
>>> getting the changes committed?
>> Stuart?  Any objections to me posting a new platform?  I've built
>> using the patches above.
>>
>> I do have a reservation about the mkimage python script.  ltib is
>> primarily perl and there currently isn't a requirement for host side
>> python.  Cn it be implemented in perl to avoid the requirement, or
>> just consider it a boutique requirement for that one platform?
>>
>>
>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> -Sean
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sean C. Malloy
>>> [email protected]
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LTIB home page: http://ltib.org
>
> Ltib mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib


-- 
Peter Barada
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
LTIB home page: http://ltib.org

Ltib mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/ltib

Reply via email to