Carmelo, I will definitely give a look in to that.
--Subrata--

On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 11:33 +0200, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
> > Subrata Modak wrote:
> >   
> >> Carmelo,
> >> Can you please share the list of such testcases, so that we can then
> >> verify and ascertain whether we need to do some initial fs check for
> >> them.
> >>
> >> --Subrata--
> >>
> >>     
> > Let me do a diff between the two logs (nfs mounted vs hd).
> Hi,
> following tests are the only ones are failing only if using a NFS 
> mounted fs,
> otherwise all are ok.
> I did not investigate further to understand if these testcases are not 
> suitable to
> be run on NFS. If I run whole LTP on hd all works fine
> (for your information, my environment is based on uClibc-nptl for sh4 
> arch, with
> GNU hash support)
> 
> fcntl14
> fcntl24
> linkat01
> splice01
> tee01
> swapon01
> utime01
> utime02
> utime03
> utime04
> vmsplice01
> writev01
> 
> Hoping it'll be useful.
> 
> Regards,
> Carmelo


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to