* Subrata Modak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 17:45 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 October 2007 03:51, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 10:28:43 -0700
> >
> > > > I'll now add remap_file_pages soon.
> > > > Maybe those other 2 tests aren't strong enough (?).
> > > It would be good if LTP were to have some remap_file_pages() tests
> > > (please). As we see here, it is something which we can easily break, and
> > > leave broken for some time.
> >
> > Here is Ingo's old test, since cleaned up and fixed a bit by me....
> > I'm sure he would distribute it GPL, but I've cc'ed him because I didn't
> > find an explicit statement about that.
> >
>
> Nick/Ingo,
> Is it OK for me to port this test case to LTP format with GPLv2 license
> statement for inclusion into LTP ??
sure enough, consider what i authored in this test licensed under the
GPLv2.
Ingo
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
