Ok, I'll post some patches to match this. - k
On Nov 22, 2007, at 9:13 AM, Subrata Modak wrote: > I would agree with that. > --Subrata > > On Thu, 2007-11-22 at 10:07 -0500, Nate Straz wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 02:17:25PM -0600, Kumar Gala wrote: >>> I'm trying to figure what the appropriate result is for some tests. >>> >>> For example, if we run on NFS, the kernel doesn't currently support >>> swap over NFS thus should a swapon test return TCONF or TBROK if the >>> test detects that its being run on a NFS fs? >> >> I would return TCONF if you can figure out that the test is not >> appropriate with the found configuration. Trying to enable swap on >> an >> NFS mount point would be a configuration error to me. >> >> TBROK would be appropriate if you created the swap file then got a >> does >> not exist error in the next step. >> >> Nate >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ >> _______________________________________________ >> Ltp-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ > _______________________________________________ > Ltp-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
