On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 09:47 +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
> Subrata Modak wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Please find below a configuration error reported by Santwana, and, then
> > the fix for the same by Amit:
> > 
> > ========================================================================================
> > ---Problem Description---
> > Configuration error in mlockall02.
> > mlockall02 did not BEHAVE as expected.
> >  
> > ---uname output---
> > Linux 2.6.18-53.el5xen #1 SMP Wed Oct 10 16:48:44 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 
> > x86_64 GNU/Linux
> >  
> > Machine Type = e326m
> >  
> > ---Debugger---
> > A debugger is not configured
> >  
> > ---Steps to Reproduce---
> > 1.Copy and untar ltp testsuite.
> > 2.Issue make followed by make install.
> > 3.Go to testcases/kernel/syscalls/mlockall directory inside the ltp test 
> > suite.
> > 4.Run mlockall02 by issuing ./mlockall02.
> > 5.It produces configuration error as :
> > "mlockall02    1  CONF  :  mlockall02 did not BEHAVE  as expected.This may 
> > be
> > okay if you are running Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 (RHEL)".
> 
> Hello,
> just as a general rule, I don't think it is correct to exit with a message
> referring to a specific Linux distro. If the issue is in some way kernel 
> related,
> it should be better something like that
> " ... This may be  (or 'is') ok if you run with a kernel version > x.y.z"
> 

Amit,

Can this message be removed through a patch and appropriate message
written instead ?

--Subrata

> In the embedded world, as mine, this info is certainly more useful.
> 
> Regards,
> Carmelo


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to