On Sunday 09 March 2008, Robert Schwebel wrote: > If one of the variables expands to nothing, the test(1) calls see the > wrong syntax. It is good shell praxis to either use > > [ "$FOO" = "bar" ]
for random variables, yes. for builtins that expand to numbers, no. > [ x$FOO = xbar ] which breaks if FOO contains whitespace. > here; this patch changes the file to use the first variant. i dont see any point since all the variables in question are numeric in nature -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
