Darren Hart wrote: > Sebastien Dugue wrote: >> Maybe a lot of the realtime tests could benefit from such an addition. >> The criterion for PASS/FAIL should IMHO be configurable, it won't be the >> same for an embedded 57 MHz ARM7 or a 10.25GHz Power9. It will also >> depend >> on the RT goals the system has been designed for. > > > Completely agree. In fact, I would prefer that the tests don't even > have a criteria unless one is passed to them. Or perhaps none at all, > and they should only report results (unless they are a functional sort > of test). Then parsers can be written with a variety of user-generated > profiles that report on if the results meet the requirements of the > profile. > > This would be a significant effort, and we should get as many people to > chime in as possible before we start any implementation in this direction.
I would imagine for all tests, a string of common args/criteria to be used in a sigle option (ex: -o arg1=xx,arg2=yy,crit1=zz,...) or stored in a file. Each test would pick the args it needs. Gilles. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
