On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 09:56 +0530, Rishikesh K. Rajak wrote: > On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 17:37 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Recently we had a discussion amongst some members, regarding the > > necessity to have at least 1 Intermediate LTP Release. This is necessary > > to confirm that new additions and fixes has not broken the existing > > stable LTP tree. As part of this initiative i plan to have the release > > of the CVS tree around 20th-25th of every month, for all of you to test > > and validate the treeś stability. We saw that the LTP nightly snapshots > > don´t work that good. So, we propose to have just 1 Intermediate LTP > > release before the final release. What do you all say about this ?? > > Thanks subrata for considering my idea, This will be a good start to > not face any problem with monthly release.
But Monthly release can still have problems, as i will not stop adding new features to LTP, if submitted between the Intermediate release and the Month-end release. However in that case, users can continue to work with the Intermediate release, which will probably available under: https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=3382, Regards-- Subrata > > As we see our monthly release is very much important and all community > totally depend on the monthly release. If this fails community will > have to go back to previous release and they can't test with new > testcases which has been newly added. > > Thanks > Rishi > IBM ISTL, Bangalore > > > > Regards-- > > Subrata > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
