On Thu, 2008-03-27 at 09:25 +0530, Ankita Garg wrote:
> Hi Sebastien, Subrata,
>
> Here is the updated patch.
Thanks Ankita. This is through.
Regards--
Subrata
>
> > On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:57:07 +0530 Subrata Modak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Sebastien/Jean/Gilles,
> > >
> > > Can you kindly provide your comments on this Patch ?
> > >
> > > Regards--
> > > Subrata
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > The following patch fixes a minor issue with pi_perf testcase
> > > (testcases/realtime/func/). The wait_dat is intended to measure the
> > > amount of time it took for the high priority thread to actually obtain
> > > the lock from the time it was released by the low priority thread. The
> > > patch fixes this computation to measure it more accurately. The
> > > PASS/FAIL computation is unaffected.
> > >
> > > Also, the patch modifies the variable names to make them more intuitive.
> > >
> > > Testing done: Compile tested and run successfully without error.
> >
> > Your patch does not apply cleanly on the latest cvs, see below hunk #3.
> > Furthermore it is rooted at ltp/testcases/realtime, it would be better
> > if it were based on the ltp root to avoid integration problems.
> >
> > Functionaly wise, it looks sane to me.
> >
> > Sebastien.
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Ankita Garg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Acked-by: Sripathi Kodi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Index: ltp/testcases/realtime/func/pi_perf/pi_perf.c
> ===================================================================
> --- ltp.orig/testcases/realtime/func/pi_perf/pi_perf.c 2008-03-27
> 09:15:58.000000000 +0530
> +++ ltp/testcases/realtime/func/pi_perf/pi_perf.c 2008-03-27
> 09:18:48.000000000 +0530
> @@ -74,9 +74,11 @@
> static unsigned int busy_work_time;
> static int num_busy = -1;
>
> -stats_container_t high_dat, low_dat, wait_dat;
> -stats_container_t wait_hist;
> -stats_quantiles_t wait_quantiles;
> +nsec_t low_unlock, high_get_lock;
> +
> +stats_container_t lock_wait_dat, low_dat, cpu_delay_dat;
> +stats_container_t cpu_delay_hist;
> +stats_quantiles_t cpu_delay_quantiles;
>
> void usage(void)
> {
> @@ -145,7 +147,8 @@
>
> low_start = rt_gettime();
> busy_work_ms(low_work_time);
> - low_hold = rt_gettime() - low_start;
> + low_unlock = rt_gettime();
> + low_hold = low_unlock - low_start;
>
> pthread_mutex_unlock(&lock);
>
> @@ -165,13 +168,13 @@
>
> void * high_prio_thread(void *arg)
> {
> - nsec_t high_start, high_spent;
> + nsec_t high_start, high_spent, high_end;
> unsigned int i;
>
> - stats_container_init(&high_dat, iterations);
> - stats_container_init(&wait_dat, iterations);
> - stats_container_init(&wait_hist, HIST_BUCKETS);
> - stats_quantiles_init(&wait_quantiles, (int)log10(iterations));
> + stats_container_init(&lock_wait_dat, iterations);
> + stats_container_init(&cpu_delay_dat, iterations);
> + stats_container_init(&cpu_delay_hist, HIST_BUCKETS);
> + stats_quantiles_init(&cpu_delay_quantiles, (int)log10(iterations));
>
> printf("High prio thread started\n");
>
> @@ -183,33 +186,36 @@
>
> high_start = rt_gettime();
> pthread_mutex_lock(&lock);
> - high_spent = rt_gettime() - high_start;
> + high_end = rt_gettime();
> + high_spent = high_end - high_start;
> + high_get_lock = high_end - low_unlock;
>
> busy_work_ms(high_work_time);
> pthread_mutex_unlock(&lock);
>
> - high_dat.records[i].x = i;
> - high_dat.records[i].y = high_spent / NS_PER_US;
> - wait_dat.records[i].x = i;
> - wait_dat.records[i].y = high_dat.records[i].y -
> low_dat.records[i].y;
> + lock_wait_dat.records[i].x = i;
> + lock_wait_dat.records[i].y = high_spent / NS_PER_US;
> + cpu_delay_dat.records[i].x = i;
> + cpu_delay_dat.records[i].y = high_get_lock / NS_PER_US;
>
> /* Wait for all threads to finish this iteration */
> pthread_barrier_wait(&bar2);
> }
>
> - stats_hist(&wait_hist, &wait_dat);
> + stats_hist(&cpu_delay_hist, &cpu_delay_dat);
> stats_container_save("samples", "pi_perf Latency Scatter Plot",
> - "Iteration", "Latency (us)", &wait_dat, "points");
> + "Iteration", "Latency (us)", &cpu_delay_dat,
> "points");
> stats_container_save("hist", "pi_perf Latency Histogram",
> - "Latency (us)", "Samples", &wait_hist, "steps");
> + "Latency (us)", "Samples", &cpu_delay_hist,
> "steps");
>
> - printf("Min wait time = %ld us\n", stats_min(&wait_dat));
> - printf("Max wait time = %ld us\n", stats_max(&wait_dat));
> - printf("Average wait time = %4.2f us\n", stats_avg(&wait_dat));
> - printf("Standard Deviation = %4.2f us\n", stats_stddev(&wait_dat));
> + printf("Time taken for high prio thread to get the lock once released
> by low prio thread\n");
> + printf("Min wait time = %ld us\n", stats_min(&cpu_delay_dat));
> + printf("Max wait time = %ld us\n", stats_max(&cpu_delay_dat));
> + printf("Average wait time = %4.2f us\n", stats_avg(&cpu_delay_dat));
> + printf("Standard Deviation = %4.2f us\n", stats_stddev(&cpu_delay_dat));
> printf("Quantiles:\n");
> - stats_quantiles_calc(&wait_dat, &wait_quantiles);
> - stats_quantiles_print(&wait_quantiles);
> + stats_quantiles_calc(&cpu_delay_dat, &cpu_delay_quantiles);
> + stats_quantiles_print(&cpu_delay_quantiles);
>
> return NULL;
> }
> @@ -253,12 +259,12 @@
>
> join_threads();
> printf("Low prio lock held time (min) = %ld us\n", stats_min(&low_dat));
> - printf("High prio lock wait time (max) = %ld us\n",
> stats_max(&high_dat));
> + printf("High prio lock wait time (max) = %ld us\n",
> stats_max(&lock_wait_dat));
> printf("Criteria: High prio lock wait time < "
> "(Low prio lock held time + %d us)\n", THRESHOLD);
>
> ret = 0;
> - if (stats_max(&high_dat) > stats_min(&low_dat) + THRESHOLD)
> + if (stats_max(&lock_wait_dat) > stats_min(&low_dat) + THRESHOLD)
> ret = 1;
>
> printf("Result: %s\n", ret ? "FAIL" : "PASS");
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
