This is the second time I'm sending this message because the first was
rejected since I was not a member of the ltp list, please ignore the
first message if it makes it through as this one contains more info:
The following patch and all others that were submitted in Feb, 2008
pertaining to "__NR_fadvise64" seem to break ARM builds of ltp as the
arm does not have __NR_fadvise64 defined. I suspect there should be:
#ifndef __NR_fadvise64
#define __NR_fadvise64 0
in each of the files that the patches were added.
Regards,
Shane
Index: posix_fadvise01.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/fadvise/posix_fadvise01.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -u -r1.1 posix_fadvise01.c
--- posix_fadvise01.c 22 Nov 2007 13:58:24 -0000 1.1
+++ posix_fadvise01.c 7 Jan 2008 11:32:21 -0000
@@ -44,6 +44,11 @@
#include "test.h"
#include "usctest.h"
+#include "linux_syscall_numbers.h"
+#ifndef _FILE_OFFSET_BITS
+#define _FILE_OFFSET_BITS 32
+#endif
+
void setup();
void cleanup();
@@ -76,6 +81,14 @@
int i;
+ /* Check this system has fadvise64 system which is used
+ in posix_fadvise. */
+ if ((_FILE_OFFSET_BITS != 64) && (__NR_fadvise64 == 0)) {
+ tst_resm(TWARN, "This test can only run on kernels that
implements ");
+ tst_resm(TWARN, "fadvise64 which is used from posix_fadvise");
+ exit(0);
+ }
+
/*
* parse standard options
*/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
