On Tuesday 22 April 2008, Subrata Modak wrote: > On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 11:45 +0100, Will Newton wrote: > > Attached is a patch to implement a strategy like this one. Is this an > > appropriate way to disable the tests in your opinion? > > Seems fine to me. Mike, what do you say ?
going by the code we have today, Will's patch looks fine. i wonder if we should introduce a new T info level (TUNIMP) as i'd wager money that we're not consistent here. some tests may do TINFO, others TWARN, and others TBROK. TUNIMP would be only for the case where the functionality does not exist on the host system. people can decide for themselves what this missing functionality means to them: do they need to implement it now (TBROK), at some point in the future (TWARN), or they just dont care (TINFO). -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
