On Sunday 20 April 2008, Subrata Modak wrote: > On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 10:40 -0700, Praveen Kandala wrote: > > When using fs_perms directly instead of the wrapper script > > "simpletest.sh" following was the result, the test fails once in 6 > > times.. > > > > w a 200 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/500) PASS > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] fs_perms]# ./fs_perms 200 99 99 99 500 w 1 > > w a 200 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/500) PASS > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] fs_perms]# ./fs_perms 200 99 99 99 500 w 1 > > w a 200 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/500) FAIL > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] fs_perms]# ./fs_perms 200 99 99 99 500 w 1 > > w a 200 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/500) PASS > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] fs_perms]# ./fs_perms 200 99 99 99 500 w 1 > > w a 200 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/500) PASS > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] fs_perms]# ./fs_perms 200 99 99 99 500 w 1 > > w a 200 file owned by (99/99) as user/group(99/500) PASS
are you still having problems ? if so, it'd be useful to have strace's to compare the failing case against the passing case. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
