On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 20:42 +0530, Subrata Modak wrote: > Hi, > > I was going through Will Newton´s Patch on the sysfs syscalls he > recently submitted to LTP: > > http://ltp.cvs.sourceforge.net/ltp/ltp/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sysfs/, > > and was thinking whether we can use this approach to Patch all the > existing syscall test cases in LTP for avoiding build failure on > machines, where this is not supported. May be it will reduce the task of > checking Kernel Version Support, Architecture Support, Glibc Support and > all that we do in our test cases to avoid build failure. > > Mike/Will, > > Do you think this can be a better approach ?
Mike/Will/Balbir/others, Do you think this can be a good idea. Or, some other proposal from your side ? Regards-- Subrata > > Regards-- > Subrata > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference > Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. > Use priority code J8TL2D2. > http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone > _______________________________________________ > Ltp-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
