hello Jose
at ltp-full-20080229/testcases/kernel/syscalls/mprotect
May I know the reason why you are not implemented mprotect to generate
EFAULT?
And in the *mprotect01.c* mentioned that
HISTORY
07/2001 Ported by Wayne Boyer
03/2002 Paul Larson: case 1 should expect ENOMEM not EFAULT
What it mean.
In the kernel source tree do we have implementation for EFAULT
from mprotect?
Thanks & regards
NARESH KAMBOJU
Senior Software Developer
Embedded Production Group
Sony India Software Center.
1st floor, East Wing,
Maruthi Info Tech Center Ring Road
Bangalore-560 071
Karnataka.
India.
Tel: 91-80-6624 7000
Fax: 91-80-6624 7250
Mobile No: 91-9886108065
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
