Subrata Modak wrote:
> Hi Pradeep,
> 
> Please provide more hardware details (architecture, kernel version,
> glibc version, distro, cpu types, etc)(avoid providing hostname info,
> which might be internal to your use) to Mike for this. Probably, he can
> then help out in finding the root cause of the problem.
> 
> Regards--
> Subrata
> 
> On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 05:51 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hi Vapier,
>>
>>           LTP test case inotify throws "get unnecessary event " and  
>> fails because test count number is incrementing to more than total  
>> number of test cases(TST_TOTAL). it is leaving below message.
>>
>> inotify02   10  FAIL : get unnecessary event: wd=1 mask=800 cookie=0  
>> len=0name=""
>>
>>
>> Could you check why is it happening?
>>

There was a bug in inotify, but has been fixed about 3 month ago in the kernel,
and the relative ltp testcase was wrong, but also fixed. So when you run the
latest ltp in an older kernel, you'll get this failure.

http://marc.info/?t=120651174200002&r=1&w=2
http://marc.info/?t=120660820500004&r=1&w=2

>> if (test_num >= TST_TOTAL){
>>                  tst_resm(TFAIL, "get unnecessary event: "
>>                      "wd=%d mask=%x cookie=%u len=%u"
>>                      "name=\"%s\"",event->wd, event->mask,
>>                      event->cookie, event->len,
>>                              event->name);
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> pradeep
>>
>>
> 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to