subrata> > There is a script in testcases/kernel/numa/test.sh that checks if
numa
subrata> > support is available. Do we replicate it over here? I guess the best
subrata> > approach would be to test for NUMA support in the toplevel Makefile
and
subrata> > pass the result to all other Makefiles.
subrata>
subrata> Don´t you think this will unnecessarily need other Makefiles to handle
subrata> NUMA code check, even if they do not need it ? If it is like that a top
subrata> level Makefile checks for libnuma and exports it, and, only those
subrata> Makefile which deals with NUMA checks for this export variable, then it
subrata> should be fine. Let us know how you would like to do this.
Hi Subrata,
Yes, only the ones that need NUMA will check for it.
BTW, there is one other problem in the patch. The third test case has
to be run with root privileges. Currently this problem is being
handled in two different ways in LTP test cases.
1. Install the program with set-uid bit set.
2. Check if the test case process has root privileges at run-time
and if not break the test case.
I guess the first approach is better. Do let me know your opinions
about this.
Regards,
Vijay
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
