"Michael Kerrisk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jeff, > > On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 10:46 PM, Jeff Moyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "Michael Kerrisk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> Jeff, >>> >>> veering off a little... >>> >>> Why are there some .1 (*not* .2) pages in the libaio tree for these >>> system calls? Most of the pages are just stubs, but io_submit looks >>> to have useful information. >> >> I have no idea. The only log entry in CVS for those files is: >> >> libaio-0.4.0 targetted changes >> >> The man pages are not part of the top-level install target, so at least >> they've never been unleashed on the world. > > Could you take a look at the io_submit.1 page in the libaio package, > and compare it to the io_submit.2 in man-pages > (http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man2/io_submit.2.html > ). The libaio page mentions details that aren't in the man-pages. Is > there some content in the former that should be moved to the latter?
Yes, the description of the iocb structure is pertinent. Also, your man page seems to use "I/O request block" for iocb. Why don't you use I/O control block? Cheers, Jeff ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
