On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 14:25 -0500, Michael Halcrow wrote: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 01:25:06PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > Quoting Subrata Modak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > Hi, > > > > > > Was just browsing through and found that this piece of code is not > > > built/installed by default. I did not find any issue to do so. So, > > > just added up to the Makefile(s). I am however investigating the > > > best possible way to run them. > > > > > > Signed-Off-By: Subrata Modak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Heh, seclvl hasn't been in the kernel in quite some time. Should it > > be dropped? > > I do not anticipate that anyone will ever try to get seclvl back into > the kernel, so I vote that the test be dropped from LTP.
Granting your wish. I have removed it from LTP. What about Serge´s following proposal: > BTW, Mike, I'd expect you to consider re-implementing some of > seclvl using capability bounding sets. Let me know if you would be implementing something somewhere in LTP. Regards-- Subrata > > Mike ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
