On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 18:10 +0530, B. N. Poornima wrote:
> Jin Bing Guo wrote:
> >
> > I think the patch can fix the build error on ppc and ppc64.
> >
> > ---
> > ltp-intermediate-20080820.orig/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sync_file_range/sync_file_range01.c
> > 2008-08-18 05:37:42.000000000 -0500
> > +++
> > ltp-intermediate-20080820/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sync_file_range/sync_file_range01.c
> > 2008-08-22 04:05:12.000000000 -0500
> > @@ -245,12 +245,12 @@ return;
> > static inline long syncfilerange(int fd, off64_t offset, off64_t
> > nbytes, unsigned int flags)
> > {
> >
> > - #if defined(__powerpc64__) && (__WORDSIZE==32)
> > + #if (defined(__powerpc__) || defined(__powerpc64__)) && (__WORDSIZE==32)
> >
> > return syscall(__NR_sync_file_range2, fd, flags, (int)(offset >>32), \
> > (int)offset, (int)(nbytes >>32), (int)nbytes);
> >
> > - #elif defined(__powerpc64__) && (__WORDSIZE==64)
> > + #elif (defined(__powerpc__) || defined(__powerpc64__)) &&
> > (__WORDSIZE==64)
> >
> > return syscall(__NR_sync_file_range2, fd, flags, offset, nbytes);
> > #else
> >
> >
> >
> > /(See attached file: Fix_build_error_sync_file_range01.patch)/
> >
> > Best regards!
> >
> > Jin Bing Guo 郭晋兵
> >
> I too had prepared the same patch, but there were some more issues on a
> different kernel. Hence, have put more checks in the newly attached patch.
> Subrata,
> I have tested it on ppc64 and x86_64 and is working fine. Please test
> and let me know.
> 

Thanks Poornima and Jin. The problem seems to be solved now on both
2.6.9-22.EL,ppc64 & 2.6.16.21-0.8-ppc64,ppc64. Your patches are merged
now.

Regards--
Subrata

> Regards,
> Poornima
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Inactive hide details for Subrata Modak ---08/21/2008 10:39:23 PM---Hi
> > Poornima,Subrata Modak ---08/21/2008 10:39:23 PM---Hi Poornima,
> >
> >                         *Subrata Modak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>*
> >
> >                         08/21/2008 10:24 PM
> >                         Please respond to
> >                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >     
> >
> > To
> >     
> > "B. N. Poornima" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > cc
> >     
> > Vijay Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [email protected],
> > suzukikp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Antonio Rosales
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, suparna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED], Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED], Masatake YAMATO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jin Bing
> > Guo/China/[EMAIL PROTECTED], Li Zefan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Shi Weihua
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Subject
> >     
> > Re: [LTP] Testcases for sync_file_range() system call
> >
> >     
> >
> >
> > Hi Poornima,
> >
> > On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 18:35 +0530, B. N. Poornima wrote:
> > > Vijay Kumar wrote:
> > > > B. N. Poornima wrote:
> > > >>> 1. The patch is modifying a generated file linux_syscall_numbers.h.
> > > >>> The files in testcases/kernel/include/*.in should have been
> > modified.
> > > >> Thanks for the input. I am attaching the modified patch with the
> > > >> above correction.
> > > >
> > > > The updated patch is still modifying linux_syscall_numbers.h.
> > > Oops...I missed the '*.in' part of it. Sorry for the inconvenience. As
> > > the remaining part of the code is already in, am re-basing only this
> > > part of the patch and attaching. Let me know if this is fine.
> >
> > I was getting some build failures for the sync_file_range() syscall
> > tests on some machine and was about to report them, when i found this
> > patch. I thought that this would solve the problem. Still the build
> > failures occur post patching. Please see the failures below and provide
> > fixes for the same. The test is against the latest ltp-intermediate
> > release. The failure are basically against the PPC64 machines, but
> > worked well on x86_64, i386 and ia64 machines:
> >
> > 1) Linux 2.6.9-22.EL #1 SMP Mon Sep 19 17:52:20 EDT 2005 ppc64 ppc64
> > ppc64 GNU/Linux
> >
> > cc -Wall -I../../include -g -Wall -I../../../../include -Wall
> > sync_file_range01.c -L../../../../lib -lltp -o sync_file_range01
> > sync_file_range01.c: In function `syncfilerange':
> > sync_file_range01.c:258: error: `__NR_sync_file_range' undeclared (first
> > use in this function)
> > sync_file_range01.c:258: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported
> > only once
> > sync_file_range01.c:258: error: for each function it appears in.)
> > make[4]: *** [sync_file_range01] Error 1
> >
> > 2) Linux 2.6.16.21-0.8-ppc64 #1 SMP Mon Jul 3 18:25:39 UTC 2006 ppc64
> > ppc64 ppc64 GNU/Linux
> >
> > make[4]: Entering directory
> > `/root/subrata/ltp/ltp-intermediate-20080820/testcases/kernel/syscalls/sync_file_range'
> > cc -Wall -I../../include -g -Wall -I../../../../include -Wall
> > sync_file_range01.c -L../../../../lib -lltp -o sync_file_range01
> > sync_file_range01.c: In function ‘syncfilerange’:
> > sync_file_range01.c:258: error: ‘__NR_sync_file_range’ undeclared (first
> > use in this function)
> > sync_file_range01.c:258: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported
> > only once
> > sync_file_range01.c:258: error: for each function it appears in.)
> > make[4]: *** [sync_file_range01] Error 1
> >
> > Regards--
> > Subrata
> >
> > > >
> > > >>> 2. When the patch was committed the generated file got added to the
> > > >>> CVS repository.
> > > >> I did not understand the problem here. Is there anything expected
> > > >> from my end?
> > > >
> > > > This issue has been fixed.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Vijay
> > > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Poornima
> >
> >
> 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to