On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 21:52 +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> Subrata,
> 
> Two patches I sent yesterday should be gone away.
> 
> The latest patch I sent today is revised, however, it is too early
> to apply LTP tree, because the new test checks a new kernel feature
> which is not included yet.

Oops. Please send those to the ltp-list whenever the respective features
are in, and you feel it is the right time to go in ;-)

Regards--
Subrata

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Subrata Modak wrote:
> > Thanks KaiGai.
> > 
> > Stephen/James,
> > 
> > Would be ACK-ing these 2 patches ?
> > 
> > 1) [LTP][PATCH 1/2] Replacement of deprecated interfaces, &
> > 2) [LTP][PATCH 2/2]  Add a new test case for bounds types,
> > 
> > Regards--
> > Subrata
> > 
> > On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 15:26 +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> >> Stephen Smalley wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2008-08-27 at 17:04 +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> >>>> James Morris wrote:
> >>>>> Could you also please add tests for this (at least one which should 
> >>>>> fail 
> >>>>> and one which should succeed) to the Linux Test Project?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - James
> >>>> Policies stored in 
> >>>> ltp/testcases/kernel/security/selinux-testsuite/refpolicy/
> >>>> invokes massive deprecated interfaces on selinux-policy-3.5.4.
> >>>>
> >>>> This patch fixes them according to the warning messages which encourage 
> >>>> to
> >>>> replace older ones.
> >>>>
> >>>> BTW, I'm not happy with the test_policy.pp does not allow to invoke test
> >>>> scripts from unconfined_t domain. Is it to be fixed?
> >>> I don't quite follow.  Did you follow the instructions in the
> >>> selinux-testsuite README?
> >> I didn't read the README file carefully, Oops.
> >>
> >> The update_refpolicy.sh fixes some of deprecated interfaces and
> >> inject an interface to kick test script from unconfined domain.
> >> So, I can run the testsuite which includs bounds test without
> >> any problems on Rawhide.
> >>
> >> # However, I got some warnings for deprecated interfaces/macros
> >> # like r_dir_perms, userdom_sysadm_bin_spec_domtrans_to or
> >> # userdom_use_sysadm_ptys.
> >>
> >> The attached patch is a new test case of the boundary feature,
> >> which contains six tests, as follows:
> >>
> >> test01: It tries to invoke setcon() with bounded domain in a multi-threaded
> >>         process. The expected result is success.
> >> test02: It tries to invoke setcon() with unrelated domain in a 
> >> multi-threaded
> >>         process. The expected result is fail.
> >> test03: It makes a bounded domain try to read a file, when its bounds 
> >> domain
> >>         can read the file. The expected result is success.
> >> test04: It makes a bounded domain try to write a file, when its bounds 
> >> domain
> >>         cannot write the file. The expected result is fail, because write
> >>         permission is boundary violated.
> >> test05: It tries to write a bounded type, even if the domain cannot write 
> >> to
> >>         its bounds type. The expected result is fail.
> >> test06: It makes a bounded domain try to set an attribute of bounded type.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >>> I can run the test scripts either using the
> >>> test_selinux.sh script or by manually loading the policy and then
> >>> individually running them as described in the README.  Watch out that
> >>> your patch doesn't disturb the existing misc/sbin_deprecated.patch that
> >>> gets applied by test_selinux.sh.  Keep in mind that this testsuite gets
> >>> run on everything from RHEL4 to F9.
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
> > If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> > the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
> > 
> 
> 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to