Thanks. As per your wish i have merged this. Regards-- Subrata
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 09:04 +0530, Sharyathi Nagesh wrote: > Helge > Excuse me if I was not clear > I am ok with your patch. > > Subrata > Can you please consider the patch for next release > Thanks > Sharyathi N > > > Helge Deller wrote: > > Hello Sharyathi, > > Hello Subrata, > > (I dropped the others from the CC list) > > > > Sharyathi Nagesh wrote: > >> Helge > >> Please go ahead and do the required modifications > > > > does this mean you are OK with my patch in > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/5424 ? > > If yes, Subrata, could you apply it? > > > > Thanks, > > Helge > > > > > >> Thanks > >> Sharyathi > >> > >>> > >>> Looking at the CVS version of glibc I don't see anything x86_64 > >>> specific in the sched_getcpu source. See the online version: > >>> http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/sched_getcpu.c?rev=1.3.2.1&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=glibc > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> So, this call is available on all Linux architectures (not only x86_64). > >>> If a architecture didn't implemented the getcpu kernel syscall, it > >>> just returns -1, which is OK and just leads to a correctly failed LTP > >>> test. > >>> > >>> Based on this, I'm still convinced that my patch which I sent in my > >>> first post (http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ltp/5424) is still > >>> correct. > >>> Please, it would be nice if you would check again. > >>> > >>> Best regards, > >>> Helge > >>> > >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
