Daniel
      I will update you once I test it on other architecture, we have
noticed similar issue with CELL processors.
I am worried if we have opened up some more issues. Give me some time
Thanks
Sharyathi N




                                                                           
             Subrata Modak                                                 
             <[EMAIL PROTECTED]                                             
             et.ibm.com>                                                To 
                                       Nagesh Sharyathi/India/[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
   
             10/21/2008 06:51                                           cc 
             PM                        [EMAIL PROTECTED], Daniel       
                                       Gollub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>            
                                                                   Subject 
             Please respond to         Re: [LTP] [PATCH] fix wrong return  
                  subrata              value of inlined getcpu()           
                                       test-function on non-i386           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           




On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 16:04 +0200, Daniel Gollub wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the getcpu() test-function returns the current scheduled CPU id of the
> test-process for archiectures expect i386, which is not the intended
return
> value of a syscall test.
>
> Attachted patch returns instead 0, for non-i386 ARCH and
__GLIBC_PREREQ(2,6).
>
> Tested on x86_64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Gollub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Waiting for Sharyathi´s comments on this.

Regards--
Subrata

>
> ---
>  testcases/kernel/syscalls/getcpu/getcpu01.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: ltp-full-20081017/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getcpu/getcpu01.c
> ===================================================================
> --- ltp-full-20081017.orig/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getcpu/getcpu01.c
> +++ ltp-full-20081017/testcases/kernel/syscalls/getcpu/getcpu01.c
> @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static inline int getcpu(unsigned *cpu_i
>            #if defined(__i386__)
>                        return syscall(318, cpu_id,node_id,cache_struct);
>            #elif __GLIBC_PREREQ(2,6)
> -                      return *cpu_id = sched_getcpu();
> +                      *cpu_id = sched_getcpu();
>            #endif
>            return 0;
>  }
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's
challenge
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great
prizes
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the
world
> http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
> _______________________________________________
> Ltp-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to