Hi Dave, On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 09:18:02PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > It may be possible to add a virtual can interface to a box, then run > > tests against itself, but according to our experience (we have been > > involved into the design & implementation of SocketCAN), it is of > > limited help, because usual problems come up with real hardware. > > Sure, but even something that can work over loopback is a good > sanity check to have there, which anyone can run.
Well, there is no such thing like loopback-can yet. The vcan is the closest we have at the moment. However, I'll discuss with my team what would be necessary to bring up some simple test things ontop of that. rsc -- Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
