On Monday 27 October 2008, Gilles.Carry wrote: > Mike Frysinger a écrit : > > ive never heard of waf. picking "the new hot system" that has no real > > penetration or community is a bad idea. > > Having such an approach makes "new hot system" never be used in anyway. > Exaclty like people used to say 15 years ago: "No one uses Linux so I'm > not using it"
yet linux proved itself and now it has a community. either the same will happen with way, or it'll wither and die. LTP's utilization of waf will make no difference at all in this outcome. LTP however clearly stands to lose out in terms of wasting developer time ... > > autoconf is probably the best at the > > moment. especially because people seem intent on using LTP for non-Linux > > targets. > > Then we should change LinuxTP name to AnyOS.TP ? we target Linux but that doesnt mean we have to tell everyone else to toss off. we can structure things nicely from the get go. if non-Linux people wish to contribute, then we can review their stuff. if it gets to be too much of a hassle, then we certainly can so "no" and they can do their own branch/fork. regardless, often times the issue of "old Linux" and "non-Linux" is the same: some headers work, some dont ... some functions exist, some dont ... -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
