Mike, quoting you from two messages:

Mike Frysinger a écrit :
 > the fact it depends on python is a bad thing imo.  since we seem to 
care about
 > people being able to build on not only non-Linux but really old Linux
 > systems, then autoconf is really the only solution that makes sense.
 > -mike

...snip...

> linux-2.2 support is pointless.  such targets are unrealistic nowadays beyond 
> a hobby hacker niche, and even that is limited.  anything that goes in for 
> linux-2.4 would be a "general" solution.  in other words, check to see if 
> interface foo() exists and if not, dont build/run the affected tests.
> 

It depends on what you call "really old systems".
Is python not supported on kernel-2.4?

I wonder what makes sense here.


Gilles.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to