On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 03:13:58PM -0500, Shane Volpe wrote: > >>Embedded systems are usually tested remotely, so there may not even be a > 'patch' command be available on the box.
That's true. > Patch only takes up about 50KB where as python (heart of LTP) takes up about > 1.9M (python-core plus all required modules). so if someone goes through the > hassle of getting python installed I do not think installing patch will be > much > more effort. What makes you think that python is needed for LTP? > How do we accomplish identifying the issues: > What I would really like to see done is ask for anyone who has used LTP in an > embedded system (post to the list) to submit a brief informal write-up of > what > it took to get LTP working. As part of the write-up they should include a > snap-shot of their test results, arch, memory and machine name if not custom. Until now, we've only managed to compile ltp for some arm and powerpc platforms; it's still not clear to me how to run the test suites remotely, so what we basically did was running single tests more or less manually. rsc -- Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 Hannoversche Str. 2, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-9 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
