Mike Frysinger a écrit :
> On Monday 17 November 2008 10:21:04 Gilles.Carry wrote:
>> I recently had the case where a test fails with something like this:
>> FAIL  :  hugeshmget01 call failed - errno = 38 : Function not implemented
>> This shows up as I don't use CONFIG_HUGETLBFS in my kernel.
>>
>> Maybe this has already been discussed but how about including kernel
>> config headers into LTP to avoid such irrelevant report?
>>
>> Thoughts?
> 
> kernel config options change.  you also cant assume the kernel location (diff 
> kernel source, cross-compile, etc...).

Of course they change, like the rest of the kernel!
When I say "include kernel config headers", I mean copy autoconf.h to 
ltp before compiling, not include it into LTP source tree.

> 
> why not just turn the TFAIL into TCONF when the function returns ENOSYS in 
> the 
> tests that concern you.

Because some might want to check if the functionality is present in the 
kernel and consider ENOSYS as a failure. This is why it must be optional.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Ltp-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list

Reply via email to