On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 12:54 +0100, Daniel Gollub wrote: > On Monday 22 December 2008 08:10:13 Subrata Modak wrote: > > Hello Everybody, > > > > Apolozise to intrude in your Christmas & New Year celebrations with an > > awkward subject in the mail. But, nevertheless this is necessary. We are > > about to close our 2008 activities shortly, and, itś time for our own > > introspection. I would like to know from all of you how we did in 2008 > > after re-inventing ourselves in early 2007. There are certain things > > depending on which our next course of actions/activities will be > > determined: > > > > 1) How many kernel issues (Bugs in code/documentation/etc) did LTP tests > > help to uncover ?? This statistics is absolutely necessary for us, as > > our primary goal is to test the kernel. And this statistics will point > > us to the grey areas, or, things which need urgent attention. It would > > be great if you can share such information. > > 2) Did we uncover issues in other libraries/manpages/etc while working > > with the tests themselves ?? In other words, while testing through LTP, > > did we enrich some other project(s) ? > [...] > > A few i remember which need to get fixed in other project and got spotted by > LTP: > > Various issues in libnuma compatibility layer for libnuma V1, spotted by > testcases/kernel/numa: > ftp://oss.sgi.com/www/projects/libnuma/download/CHANGES > (fixed in libnuma 2.0.3-rc1) > > Wrong glibc fortify-check, spotted by getgroups4 testcase: > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6980 >
Thanks Daniel for letting us know about this. Regards-- Subrata > best regards, > Daniel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
