On Monday 29 December 2008 21:02:02 Jiri Palecek wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > the discussion was about behavior in general, not this specific case. > > the comments you posted originally were generalized and the wording did > > not speak to this specific example. > > I'm a little confused. Did you want to say you're satisfied with the new > changelog entry, you are less satisfied, there was a misunderstanding and > now it's clear, or there was a misunderstanding and now there's an even > bigger one, or something completely different?
sorry, what new changelog ? the only patch (and changelog) i recall seeing is the very first one which we all agree is not OK. the assumption on my end was that you would submit a new patch/changelog fresh to address things (as that is how it the process typically runs). -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
