Thanks. Regards-- Subrata
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 11:51 -0500, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote: > On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 08:42 -0500, Christopher J. PeBenito wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 21:32 +1100, James Morris wrote: > > > I'm trying to run the LTP SELinux tests using the latest CVS version of > > > LTP and current Fedora development, and get the following policy > > > compilation error: > > > > > > ---- > > > Compiling targeted test_policy module > > > > > > test_policy.te:1730: Warning: r_dir_perms is deprecated please use > > > list_dir_perms instead. > > > test_policy.te:1731: Warning: r_file_perms is deprecated please use > > > read_file_perms instead. > > > [lots of warnings similar to the above] > > > > > > /usr/bin/checkmodule: loading policy configuration from > > > tmp/test_policy.tmp > > > test_policy.te":16:ERROR 'syntax error' at token > > > 'userdom_use_sysadm_terms' on line 3198: > > > userdom_use_sysadm_terms(testdomain) > > > # This allows read and write sysadm ttys and ptys. > > > /usr/bin/checkmodule: error(s) encountered while parsing configuration > > > make[1]: *** [tmp/test_policy.mod] Error 1 > > > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/share/selinux/devel' > > > make: *** [load] Error 2 > > > Failed to build and load test_policy module, aborting test run. > > > ---- > > > > > > Is this likely to be fixed soon, and/or any suggestions for a workaround? > > > > It won't compile with the current trunk refpolicy, since the current > > release was a major, API breaking change. I'll try to get a patch out > > shortly. > > I updated the policy since its fairly old, though I didn't convert its > raw rules over to use interfaces. However this didn't completely fix > it, as there is usage of a "unconfined_runs_test()", which isn't in the > upstream refpolicy nor the fedora policy, as far as I can see. One of > the updates includes use of sysadm_entry_spec_domtrans_to(), which is in > the upstream refpolicy, but doesn't seem to have made its way downstream > to the fedora policy. I have attached my work so someone familiar with > the LTP test cases can use it to complete the fix. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > SourcForge Community > SourceForge wants to tell your story. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword > _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your story. http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword _______________________________________________ Ltp-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list
